From: Transform Ukraine By Douglas Landro / September 3, 2025
Russian President Leverages Meeting with Slovak PM to Feign Diplomacy While Kremlin Officials Deny Peace Meeting Prospects and Moscow Signs Major Gas Deal with China
Summary of the Day – September 2, 2025
Vladimir Putin presented marginal concessions during his Beijing meeting with Slovak PM Robert Fico while maintaining demands for Ukraine’s capitulation and blaming Western aggression. Despite suggesting openness to EU membership for Ukraine and possible Zaporizhzhia plant cooperation, Putin rejected genuine peace negotiations as Kremlin officials denied bilateral meeting prospects. Russia signed the Power of Siberia-2 gas pipeline with China amid mounting economic pressure from sanctions and Ukrainian strikes, while North Korea deployed 6,000 additional troops to Russia with 2,000 casualties reported. Trump expressed disappointment with Putin as Ukrainian forces liberated Udachne village near Pokrovsk, while 203 Russian drones forced Kyiv schoolchildren underground during massive bombardment campaigns.

Putin’s Theater of Concessions: Minimal Offers Mask Unchanged Position
Russian President Vladimir Putin leveraged his meeting with Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico in Beijing to present what appeared to be concessions while maintaining his fundamental demands for Ukraine’s complete capitulation. Putin claimed Russia has never opposed Ukraine joining the European Union, though maintaining opposition to NATO membership, while suggesting possible cooperation with the United States and Ukraine on the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant if “favorable circumstances” arise.
These marginal concessions came alongside Putin’s continued blame of the West for provoking Russian aggression, reiterating claims that the 2014 “coup” in Ukraine justified Russia’s invasions in both 2014 and 2022. Putin also denied Russia has future plans to attack another European country, despite his military’s continued offensive operations across multiple Ukrainian fronts.
The timing of these limited offers appeared calculated to feign interest in peace negotiations roughly two weeks after Trump reiterated his desire for direct peace talks. However, the concessions remained tangential to core issues while Putin maintained demands for regime change in Kyiv and Ukraine’s withdrawal from contested territories.
Kremlin’s Categorical Denial: No Agreement for Peace Meetings
Russian Presidential Aide Yuriy Ushakov definitively contradicted White House statements about potential peace meetings, stating there was no agreement between Trump and Putin for bilateral Ukrainian-Russian or trilateral discussions. Speaking on September 2, Ushakov claimed ongoing U.S.-Russian dialogue relates primarily to the “Ukrainian conflict” but that it remains “too early to discuss bilateral relations.”